User Contributed Dictionary
Adjective
impassibleExtensive Definition
Impassibility (from Latin in-, "not",
passibilis, "able to suffer, experience emotion") describes the
theological doctrine that God does not experience
pain or pleasure from the actions of
another being. Some theological systems portray God as a being
subject to many (or all) emotions; in Christianity,
Judaism, and Islam, however, it is understood that God is not
subject to sin. Biblical scholars do not take anthropomorphic
phrases in the Bible like "the finger of God" or "the hand of God"
to mean that God literally has a hand or finger. This is not the
case in all religions: many folk religions, especially ones dealing
with ancestor
worship, will treat good weather, favorable harvests, etc., as
a sign that the gods are pleased, and will attribute disease or
misfortune to their anger.
Many polytheistic traditions portray their gods
as feeling a wide range of emotions. For example, Zeus is famous for his
lustfulness, Susano-o for his
intemperance, and Balder for his
joyousness and calm. Impassibility in the Western tradition traces
back to ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle and
Plato, who
first proposed the idea of God as a perfect, omniscient, timeless, and
unchanging being not subject to human emotion (which represents
change and imperfection). The concept of impassibility was
developed by medieval theologians like Anselm
and continues to be in tension with more emotional concepts of God.
Recent works on divine impassibility:
Gavrilyuk, Paul L. (2004).
The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic
Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004/ 2006.
Weinandy, Thomas G. (2000). Does
God Suffer? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press,
2000.
Creel, Richard E. (1986). Divine Impassibility.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.